A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
case legislation Case law is regulation that is based on judicial decisions instead than regulation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case legislation concerns one of a kind disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation , refers to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions with a particular issue or matter.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Female don't approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and also private respondents and will take care of each of the facets of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller sized role in developing case law in common law than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much on the exposition on the law in civil regulation traditions is done by lecturers fairly than by judges; this is called doctrine and could be published in treatises or in journals including Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common regulation courts relied tiny on legal scholarship; thus, for the turn in the twentieth century, it was incredibly rare to discover an academic writer quoted in a very legal decision (except Potentially for your tutorial writings of well known judges such as Coke and Blackstone).
Should you find an error inside the articles of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or even a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation requires that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in the particular court. Indeed, Each and website every circuit has its personal list of binding case law. Subsequently, a judgment rendered from the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
ten. Based over the findings from the inquiry committee, this petition is not really viewed as maintainable and it is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced with the findings within the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more